Busan loses World Expo 2030 bid
Yoon apologizes for Busan's Expo bid failure; Mayor open to 2035 rebid
Apgujeong Rolls Royce hit-and-run victim dies after 4 months in coma
South Korea warns tit-for-tat action over North Korea’s border buildup
AI robots to aid English education in Seoul schools
Top universities may reopen door to ROTCBy 류근하
Published : Jan. 4, 2011 - 17:55
Many campuses dropped ROTC during the 1960s and ‘70s as student and faculty objections to the war in Vietnam mounted and protesters viewed the program as offering assistance to a discredited military engagement. The end of that war and of the draft softened objections at some campuses, but they were reignited in recent years over the military’s policy of discriminating against gays and lesbians. Colleges that forbade discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation understandably were reluctant to allow an organization that explicitly engaged in such discrimination to operate on campus.
As a result, however, the gap between America’s elite universities and its largely poor and minority military grew ever wider, with unhappy implications for society as a whole.
With the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” several leading universities moved quickly to close that gap. Harvard President Drew Gilpin Faust called the action historic, saying it affirmed “American ideals of equal opportunity and underscores the importance of the right to military service as a fundamental dimension of citizenship.” Faust added that she was “pleased that more students will now have the opportunity to serve their country.”
At Columbia, President Lee C. Bollinger said the repeal “effectively ends what has been a vexing problem for higher education, including at Columbia ― given our desire to be open to our military, but not wanting to violate our own core principle against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.”
ROTC may not be right for every university campus ― indeed, interest at some schools is so low that the military itself may not want to return to them. But it highlights the significance of ending the ban that the nation’s military and social values no longer collide. That alone is progress.
(Los Angeles Times, Dec. 30)
BOK holds key rate steady, cuts 2024 growth outlook
NK will never discuss 'sovereignty' with US, says Kim Yo-jong
Yoon revives policy chief of staff position