[Fu Ying] How should China respond to a changing US?

By Korea Herald
  • Published : Sept 12, 2018 - 17:07
  • Updated : Sept 12, 2018 - 17:07

Visiting the US recently, I was told by virtually every American I met that attitudes toward China had shifted. This phenomenon, they claimed, cut across bipartisan lines as well as government, business and academic circles. The US was frustrated at not having shaped China in its own image, despite bringing the country into the World Trade Organization and helping to enable its economic takeoff. Instead, China had “ripped off” the US by taking advantage of it in trade and business. There was concern at how fast China was climbing up the global economic and technological ladder, and that its military was threatening to “elbow out” the US from Asia.

Judging from American history, major strategies are usually shaped through trial and error, in response to specific challenges. Consensus develops along the way. Any adjustment in the US posture toward China will therefore take time. This also means that the final outcome will be affected by how the two countries act and react in the coming months and years.

China isn’t America’s only failure -- nor the worst one. In fact, given what’s happened to some countries since the “color revolutions” and Arab Spring, the US should be thankful its efforts haven’t thrown China into political turmoil and economic chaos. The fact that China has maintained social and political stability and followed its own economic path has contributed to global economic growth, especially after the 2008 financial crisis.

True, China’s fortunes have risen as well. Taking advantage of the globalization promoted by the US and Europe, hardworking Chinese gained access to global capital, technologies, expertise and markets. Hundreds of millions of Chinese came out of poverty and living standards in the country have risen substantially.

But it’s important to remember two things. First, Chinese workers paid a steep cost for these developments. After entering the World Trade Organization, Chinese enterprises were suddenly thrown into direct competition with global peers. Many of them didn’t survive, leading to huge layoffs. At the same time, more than 2,000 laws and regulations had to be revised or abolished at the national level and about 190,000 more at the local level.

Second, China’s gains have benefited the US as well. According to Oxford Economics, US-China trade helps each American family save $850 every year. Between 2001 and 2016, US commodities exports to China expanded five times, much higher than the 90 percent average increase. Any attempt to “decouple” it from the US or the global economy will hurt all countries, including the US.

So what should China’s response be? The Chinese have to stay cool-headed in the face of tough but confusing messages from the US. We must stay focused on China’s development, and overcome our own difficulties.

China is not adopting a more confrontational stance toward the US. Its overall foreign policy, is aimed at ensuring a sound environment that facilitates effective cooperation with the outside world to serve China’s development goals. For its purposes, there’s every reason for China to maintain an attitude of “constructive cooperation” with the US.

In fact, changes in US-China relations may help to push China’s own desired reforms. Some requests raised by US companies, such as increased market access, dovetail with recommendations from China’s leaders. The government is, in fact, opening up: Eight out of the 11 market-opening measures announced by President Xi Jinping in April have been put in place, covering banking, securities, insurance, credit rating, credit investigation and payment, and so on. The government is also working harder to improve the business environment and strengthen intellectual property protections for both Chinese and foreign enterprises.

But make no mistake: The Chinese people will stand firm against US bullying over trade. There is talk about China’s economy “sliding down” as a result of the trade war. Some expect China to succumb soon. I can tell you that this is wishful thinking.

Yes, China is in the process of deleveraging, which is uncomfortable and painful. But it is a price worth paying for sustaining healthy development. It’s worth remembering that China adopted a stimulus program to help overcome the global recession triggered by the 2008 financial tsunami in the US.

Finger-pointing and hurting each other won’t solve any problems. They will only make things worse. This is why China will continue to work with all countries, including the US, in areas of mutual concern -- from climate change to transnational crime to epidemics to nuclear nonproliferation.

This is also why China should continue talking to the US. Many in China believe that the root causes of US troubles lie within -- and therefore need to be solved by Americans themselves. We can see that the US system requires a major overhaul to overcome deep sociopolitical divisions and economic disparities. But that doesn’t relieve China of the responsibility to engage in dialogue, to find out where the two sides can and can’t agree and to seek solutions or at least ways to manage persistent disputes.

Such an approach won’t appeal to those who seek confrontation now. But, to borrow a saying, if some folks want to chase butterflies, why should the rest of us go dancing along with them?

Fu Ying
Fu Ying is chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee of China’s National People’s Congress, and of the Academic Committee of China’s Institute of International Strategy at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. -- Ed.